← Files

The Stroll of a Distracted Painter: the Kaleidoscopic Creativity of Akira Zakamoto

Francesca Bogliolo · 2012

Rodari held that 'by making mistakes one invents,' that from error fantastic and creative paths can arise: it all depends on indulging one's mistakes, on giving them meaning and interpreting their value. Akira Zakamoto's creative path seems to want to make this concept explicit, to set it as the foundation of his creative motivation, of his restless experimentation.
Error is enclosed by Zakamoto in his very name, which in Japanese is an impossible, mistaken name that pays homage to the East, evokes it, somehow contains it, and makes the artist recognisable: it gives him an identity whose contours are hard to pin down, given his vast and many-sided output, which nonetheless appears as clear and limpid as a children's fairy tale, immediately graspable in its communicative substance. Children are often asked: 'where is your head?' — face, eyes, nose, smile all seem to have slipped, landing on Zakamoto's canvases, mirror-paintings of an artist we can imagine touching his neck as he paints, to make sure his head is still in place. His angel-children, superheroes, world-creators, metaphors of a possible world, are children with their head on their shoulders; they are children's faces that guide us into a new world where a poetics that aims to herald a better world is not only possible but actually real.
In this world Akira Zakamoto moves at ease in their company, is reborn, recognises what remains of a time that, according to his poetics, is eternal. He seems to quote a phrase traditionally attributed to Dante Alighieri, reminding us that of Paradise we are left the sky, the stars and children — and in doing so he grants his children a privileged role as narr-actors, highlighting, time and again, their gaze or their gestures, focusing on details that attract him more than others, that seem to reveal a secret better than others. As in Rodari's 'The Stroll of a Distracted Boy,' Zakamoto's little boy loses himself, little by little, in the gaze of his characters, which is the common thread of his entire poetics.
The portraits, real and reinterpreted, seem to contain references to pop art, to manga, to his graphic training; yet all this is reread in the light of original content, in a coloured kaleidoscope made of harmonic parts that resonate together before our eyes. At the end of the journey through a Zakamoto exhibition, all this becomes clear, as if we had read a content-rich text translated into simple, essential terms. As if, waiting on the threshold for the painter at the end of a stroll among his meanings, we were left holding — gifted by the canvases — important pieces with which to understand him. On finding him again, we can only act like the mother of Rodari's distracted boy who, putting her son back together, reassures him. We will have nothing left to do but say, with a smile, 'Yes, Zakamoto, you really did well.'